Yesterday, the Supreme Constitutional Court began examining the unconstitutionality of the text of Articles (47 and 48) of Law 12 of 2003 and amended by Law 180 of 2008 regarding the Unified Labor Law.
The lawsuit, which held No. 81 of 37, was filed to claim that the text of articles (47 and 48) of Law 12 of 2003 and amended by Law 180 of 2008 regarding the unified labor law were unconstitutional.
Article 47 of the Labor Law stipulates that "the period of annual leave shall be 21 days with full wages for those who have spent in service for a full year, to be increased to thirty days when the worker has spent ten years with the employer or more, and the leave is for thirty days in the year for those He has not exceeded the age of fifty, and he does not include in the calculation of leave the days of holidays and official occasions and weekly rest. Annual leave of seven days for workers who work in the business A game or dangerous or harmful to health or in remote areas, which is determined by a decision of the competent minister after taking the opinion of the concerned authorities, and taking into account the provision of the second paragraph of Article (48) of this law, the worker may not give up his leave.
العربية 
English